This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] C++ space optimization: de-cloning con/de/structors
- From: Stuart Hastings <stuart at apple dot com>
- To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 10:46:18 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] C++ space optimization: de-cloning con/de/structors
On Wednesday, Aug 7, 2002, at 04:26 US/Pacific, Toon Moene wrote:
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Matt Austern:
Are we currently using multiple entry points for anything other than
the Fortran ENTRY statement?
No, we're not. In fact, we don't even support ENTRY, as far as I
know.
Well, obviously, we do - otherwise we couldn't call g77 a Fortran 77
compiler :-)
I assumed as much, for exactly the reason you state. :-)
The implementation of ENTRY is discussed in our documentation:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77/Alternative-Entry-Points.html
Actually, I found it at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77/Alternate-Entry-Points.html
(Omit the "iv" from "Alternative.")
I commend you for the excellent documentation! I'm impressed, and I'm
not a FORTRAN person. It appears that G77 is doing a more
sophisticated version of what the de-cloner does.
Thank-you for the pointer; 'twas an interesting read.
stuart hastings
Apple Computer