This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled

From: Adam Nemet <anemet at Lnxw dot COM>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 05 Aug 2002 01:20:34 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
References: <200207311232.NAA07048@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com><hcvg6v5ald.fsf@anemet1.lynx.com><m3r8hiy6ro.fsf_-_@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><hck7n94sl8.fsf@anemet1.lynx.com><m3ptx1tgb6.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>

Nick,

> Sadly there is one unexpected failure with -mpic-register=6 that is
> not present without it:
> 
>         gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c -O0
> 
> I have not investigated this yet, nor have I checked to see if it
> happens without the patch applied...

If you meant -mpic-register=6 together with -mthumb then yes that
fails even without the patch.  I checked my regression-baseline logs
and also tried manually with an unpatched cc1.  I think the patch is
safe. 

I will submit a separate (unrelated) patch to fix the above failure. 

Adam

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
  - From: Adam Nemet
- Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]