This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH?] Implement exp and log builtins as x86 intrinsics


What about other OS's?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

On Sunday, August 4, 2002, at 05:47 , Fergus Henderson wrote:

On 04-Aug-2002, Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com> wrote:

IMO there's no point in doing this if you leave the thing as one
large hunk of code.  Why aren't you allowing this to be scheduled?
The main point was that the code would get inlined, as is done by
Microsoft's MSVC and Intel's compilers, for example.
It will already get inlined with GCC currently, if the library defines
it appropriately, as is done by the GNU C library.

(True since at least gcc-2.95.2 and glibc-2.1.3.)

--
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.








Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]