This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: New approach to --with-cpu
- From: "John David Anglin" <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
- To: drow at mvista dot com (Daniel Jacobowitz)
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:52:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: RFC: New approach to --with-cpu
> Historical inconsistency. PA appears to define -mschedule but not
> -mtune; the meaning appears to be about the same. One thing I will
> _not_ do is allow --with-tune to set -mschedule, though; I'd rather add
> -mtune to PA and then use --with-tune.
My preference would be to leave things as they are and use --with-schedule.
-mschedule relates directly to the scheduling model. The option value is PA
specific anyway. We also have a whole bunch of other oddball -m options
which affect bits in the target flags.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)