This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: New approach to --with-cpu


>From a PA standpoint, the main objection that I have to this approach
is that there seems to be a slight loss of flexibility.  You use "with_cpu"
to set the default scheduling model.  However, I was also planning to set
the default arch based on the target machine when a linker bug in handling
PA2.0 code is fixed.  I view these options as independent although the
configure defaults would both be based on the target triplet.  Thus,
it would be necessary to introduce a new configure option to handle
the arch default.  In the future, I can see other default code generation
options being set-table.

I must admit that I don't really like the multilib concept and find
it a rather  idea to build libraries for all scheduling models,
archs, etc.  Thus, I don't find this justification attractive.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]