This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: powerpc64 libstdc++

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 18:24:58 +0930
Subject: Re: powerpc64 libstdc++
References: <20020728000014.GW26054@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <200207280020.UAA08484@makai.watson.ibm.com>

On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 08:20:30PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Alan Modra writes:
> 
> Alan> I should have mentioned that I checked current glibc sources too.  It's
> Alan> wrong to leave these functions in without some changes as they operate
> Alan> on "long", yet use "lwarx" and "stwcx.".
> 
> 	Okay, remove the other functions.
> 
> 	Somehow I think this would be nicer with _LOAD_LINKED and
> _STORE_CONDITONAL macros substituted in the inlined assembly and
> conditionally set to the appropriate PowerPC instruction.

http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_11.html#SEC11 prefers "if ()" over
"#ifdef".

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: powerpc64 libstdc++
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- Re: powerpc64 libstdc++
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: powerpc64 libstdc++
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]