This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Get rid of some warnings
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Sebastian Pop <s dot pop at laposte dot net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:50:53 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Get rid of some warnings
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > > > /cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:1410: warning: `requires_edge_placement' defined but not used
> > Leave this, until i'm sure we don't need to do critical edge splitting in
> > cases we don't (the statement inserters effectively do it by creating
> > scopes).
> >
> > > > /cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/tree-alias-steen.c:927: warning: `find_func_decls' defined but not used
> >
> > Leave this one alone, too.
> > I still haven't tested what the performance/memory impact of creating
> > alias variables for local son the fly/creating them before we start alias
> > analysis (it's not as cut and dry a tradeoff as it would seem).
> >
> Maybe it would be a good idea to #if 0 around these.
okeydokey.
I had already either commented out (with reasoning listed) or #if 0'd the
calls to them, but i guess it won't hurt to #if 0 the functions themselves.
>
>
> Diego.
>
>
>
>