This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: regrename bug fix
- From: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at superh dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:44:30 +0100
- Subject: Re: regrename bug fix
- Organization: SuperH UK Ltd.
- References: <200207162140.RAA30826@makai.watson.ibm.com>
David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> Substituting one bug for another is not acceptable. Yes, your
> patch fixes a bug and it will eventually be re-enabled. But stopping me
> and other AIX and powerpc64-linux developers from working is not
> considerate. Why should each developer on an affected target need to
> learn that they cannot bootstrap because of your patch and individually
> revert it?
Why should each developer on an affected target need to learn that they
cannot bootstrap because my patch is missing and individually apply it?
--
--------------------------
SuperH
2430 Aztec West / Almondsbury / BRISTOL / BS32 4AQ
T:+44 1454 462330