This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++] Unreviewed patches
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "lerdsuwa at users dot sourceforge dot net" <lerdsuwa at users dot sourceforge dot net>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:30:29 -0700
- Subject: Re: [C++] Unreviewed patches
- References: <3D3439C1.6226B48C@users.sourceforge.net> <503440000.1026851318@gandalf.codesourcery.com>
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 01:28:38PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> It doesn't actually test whether or not the compiler is inlining
> the function or not. I can't think of a practical way to test that,
> so you may as well drop the test.
If all copies are supposed to be inlined, then one
can use a scan-assembler-not test for the symbol.
r~