This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC & patch: Rework MIPS command-line handling

From: cgd at broadcom dot com
To: mdb at gnu dot org
Cc: "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo at redhat dot com>,"Thiemo Seufer" <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 15 Jul 2002 10:47:34 -0700
Subject: Re: RFC & patch: Rework MIPS command-line handling
References: <wvnfzyodh02.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com><20020714172200.GH19894@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de><wvnu1n1b8p4.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com><200207151039.g6FAdYm61375@merlot.juniper.net><mailpost.1026729642.18965@news-sj1-1>

At Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:40:42 +0000 (UTC), "Mark D. Baushke" wrote:
> In MIPS I the -mlong64 also implies the use of register pairs right? 
> Where in MIPS III, the -mlong64 implies the use of a single register.

yes.

Several people, myself included, would be ... quite happy if that mode
went away completely, i.e. -mlong64 were disallowed if GPRs weren't
also 64-bit.

Are you actually using -mlong64 w/ 32-bit GPR systems?

cgd

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC & patch: Rework MIPS command-line handling
  - From: Mark D. Baushke

References:
- RFC & patch: Rework MIPS command-line handling
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFC & patch: Rework MIPS command-line handling
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: RFC & patch: Rework MIPS command-line handling
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFC & patch: Rework MIPS command-line handling
  - From: Mark D. Baushke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]