This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: another simd bug fix (Was: Re: RFA: improved generic simd operations)

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at superh dot com>
Cc: Falk Hueffner <falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:55:54 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA: another simd bug fix (Was: Re: RFA: improved generic simd operations)
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <3D1B1E4C.6D16F6F6@superh.com> <3D1B5017.7D1FA5@superh.com> <3D22063E.70DB750B@superh.com> <87r8ilbt6e.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de> <3D22F082.B3DFAB35@superh.com> <20020709163203.GA5639@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <3D2B1493.496D8137@superh.com> <20020709171651.GA5869@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <3D2B21AB.13AA4A28@superh.com> <3D2B29E6.E99D4E93@superh.com>

On Tue, 09 Jul 2002, Joern Rennecke wrote:

> At any rate, if we don't have a mode, we can't have a
> valid subreg.  So we should just reject this substitution.
> 
This fixes the SPEC regression.  Thanks.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: another simd bug fix (Was: Re: RFA: improved generic simd operations)
  - From: Jeff Law

References:
- Re: RFA: improved generic simd operations
  - From: Falk Hueffner
- RFA: another simd bug fix (Was: Re: RFA: improved generic simd operations)
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: RFA: another simd bug fix (Was: Re: RFA: improved generic simd operations)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: RFA: another simd bug fix (Was: Re: RFA: improved generic simd operations)
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]