This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Kill gen_sequence


   From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@onetel.net.uk>
   Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 02:21:39 +0100 (BST)

   No, using a cache doesn't imply a limit in sequence depth.  But
   that is moot, since there is a simpler way: having end_sequence
   return the struct sequence_stack.
   
Now that you've said this I feel differently.  Why didn't you mention
returning a struct from end_sequence from the beginning?  Are you
willing to implement this?

I'll just toss my changes meanwhile, as I don't have the time to work
on the sequence_stack version, I already put more than a week into
these hacks.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]