This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ast-optimizer-branch]: tree-cfg.c insertion fixes
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:22:20 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [ast-optimizer-branch]: tree-cfg.c insertion fixes
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jun 2002, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Diego Novillo wrote:
> >
> > > Any reason why we shouldn't convert all these insert_* functions
> > > to operate on SIMPLE trees exclusively? It would probably make
> > > our lives easier.
> >
> > They do, for the most part, i've not changed that.
> >
> Actually, the insert_* functions predate SIMPLE. That's why I
> was thinking about re-implementing them.
If you do, be careful, because we need to be able to incrementally update
the SSA, so you need to keep track of which bb's are new/statements are
new due to simplification.
> In the meantime I guess
> we should fix the bug. I'll take a look at the patch.
>
> Thanks. Diego.
>