This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: thread-local storage: c++ front end

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 14:31:48 -0400
Subject: Re: thread-local storage: c++ front end
References: <20020521191328.A10948@redhat.com><wvlu1p0j39l.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><20020522112407.A25843@redhat.com>

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

>> This should probably go in obscure_complex_init.

> Hmm, ok.  I'd had that there at first, but then thought that
> more things than constructors went through it.

Yes.  I thought you wanted to give an error for any thread-local variable
that required run-time initialization.  If not, why are constructors
special?

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: thread-local storage: c++ front end
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- thread-local storage: c++ front end
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: thread-local storage: c++ front end
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: thread-local storage: c++ front end
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]