This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.1 Released
- From: Nicola Pero <nicola at brainstorm dot co dot uk>
- To: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
- Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, shebs at apple dot com
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 13:08:32 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Released
> >> >> > +<li>Loading of categories has been fixed in certain situations (GNU
> >> >> > +runtime only).</li>
> >> >> > +<li>The class lookup in the runtime library has been rewritten so that
> >> >> > +class method dispatch is more than twice as fast as it used to be (GNU
> >> >> > +runtime only).</li>
> >> >>
> >> >> IIRC, we agreed to use the spelling "run-time" (adjective), didn't we?
> >>
> >> > Ok - thanks - didn't know - the patch will use `run-time' then.
> >>
> >> Except that `GNU run time' (with or without a blank?)
> >
> > Ehmmm ... you don't seem to agree, do you ? :-)
>
> I missed the second case, so Alexandre is correct: "GNU run time"
> (noun) and "run-time library" (adjective) are the preferred forms.
Ok then -
+<li>Loading of categories has been fixed in certain situations (GNU
+run time only).</li>
+<li>The class lookup in the runtime library has been rewritten so that
+class method dispatch is more than twice as fast as it used to be (GNU
+run time only).</li>
would that be ok ?