This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH to emit_tinfo_decl

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 16:13:07 -0700
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH to emit_tinfo_decl
References: <200205132140.g4DLeJVr000285@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <wvlwuu4em5g.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <20020516105224.C25830@redhat.com> <3CE3FC76.EFD386AF@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:37:42PM +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> the sizeof the typeid struct for T depends on whether T has
> no bases, one single non-virtual base, or is more complicated.

In which case, it ought to be incomplete itself, correct?
IIRC, incomplete types have size zero, and small data opts
are supposed to ignore those.  Fibbing with size 8 is surely
the worst thing that can be done.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ PATCH to emit_tinfo_decl
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: C++ PATCH to emit_tinfo_decl
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- Re: C++ PATCH to emit_tinfo_decl
  - From: John David Anglin
- Re: C++ PATCH to emit_tinfo_decl
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH to emit_tinfo_decl
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: C++ PATCH to emit_tinfo_decl
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]