This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fix weak-5 on alpha

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:14:24 -0700
Subject: Re: fix weak-5 on alpha
References: <200205152023.31467@enzo.bigblue.local> <20020515095331.A19955@redhat.com> <200205151918.53404@enzo.bigblue.local> <20020515104549.A25092@redhat.com> <200205152023.31467@enzo.bigblue.local> <20020515171535.D25336@redhat.com> <5.1.1.2.2.20020516114902.03e3d008@mail.lauterbach.com>

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:56:17AM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> Hmm, unfortunately I didn't notice that in your last patch, but why do you 
> warn about vfoo1f and vfoo1g now? In both cases the variable is defined, so 
> dereferencing is no problem, even if it is weak, or?

No.  Specifically, one may not apply small data or gp-relative
optimizations to weak symbols.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fix weak-5 on alpha
  - From: Franz Sirl

References:
- Re: fix weak-5 on alpha
  - From: Franz Sirl
- fix weak-5 on alpha
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: fix weak-5 on alpha
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: fix weak-5 on alpha
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: fix weak-5 on alpha
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: fix weak-5 on alpha
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]