This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ast-optimizer-branch]: SAVE_EXPR's not simplified right




--On Wednesday, May 08, 2002 12:48:29 PM +0100 Jason Merrill 
<jason@redhat.com> wrote:

>>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> Jason, what issues make you favor elimination in post-processing pass
>> instead of getting rid of it from the outset?
>
> Because when I'm generating code that needs to store a temporary result, I
> don't want to have to worry about setting up an appropriate scope and
> inserting a DECL_STMT by hand.  Lifetime of temporaries issues are tricky.
> Though I suppose that it wouldn't be difficult to encapsulate that stuff
> in, say, create_temporary_var.  So never mind.

Yup, that's what I had in mind...

Well, now we just need someone to do it.

We've already got problems where we keep adding optimizations and keep
making our compiler slower; people don't like this.  If we can eliminate
SAVE_EXPRs in the front end as we create them, rather than in the
optimizer, we win.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]