This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set

From: Anton Blanchard <anton at samba dot org>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>,"gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:36:32 +1000
Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
References: <20020428054450.GA17500@krispykreme> <20020427.225235.08665315.davem@redhat.com> <236260000.1020019695@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <20020428233912.GA3698@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <256600000.1020038373@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <20020429002731.GB3698@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <wvladrli6x0.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

 
> What exactly is the bug?

It all began when I discovered -Winline does not work in current gcc 3.1 CVS.
When debugging this I found the multitude of inline related flags quite
confusing and it seems Im not the only one.

Anton

References:
- gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Anton Blanchard
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]