This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 3.1 PATCH: Set LD_LIBRARY{N32, 64}_PATH in libstdc++-v3 testsuite

From: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
Cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, David Billinghurst <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 03:37:53 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: Re: 3.1 PATCH: Set LD_LIBRARY{N32, 64}_PATH in libstdc++-v3 testsuite
References: <15565.61858.903223.479334@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE><Pine.BSF.4.30.0204292131450.79276-100000@dair.pair.com>

Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:

> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Rainer Orth wrote:
> 
>  if [isnative] {
> 
> > +    setenv  LD_LIBRARY_PATH     $ld_library_path
> > +    setenv  SHLIB_PATH          $ld_library_path
> > +    setenv  LD_LIBRARYN32_PATH  $ld_library_path
> > +    setenv  LD_LIBRARY64_PATH   $ld_library_path
> > +
> 
> }
> 
> Dunno if it your patch as-is would actually would make
> cross-testing fail though.

I doubt it: exactly the same code (without the isnative test) is present in
the g++, g77, and objc testsuites, obviously without breaking things there.

	Rainer

References:
- 3.1 PATCH: Set LD_LIBRARY{N32, 64}_PATH in libstdc++-v3 testsuite
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: 3.1 PATCH: Set LD_LIBRARY{N32, 64}_PATH in libstdc++-v3 testsuite
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]