This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [3.1] Re: RFH PR 5877 (sse comparisons)
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"rth at cygnus dot com" <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:53:06 +0200
- Subject: Re: [3.1] Re: RFH PR 5877 (sse comparisons)
- References: <20020309163708.N2434@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20020314114647.GT16922@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020429125516.GB25342@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <264370000.1020091236@gandalf.codesourcery.com>
> >Mark: I would like to see this patch in the branch. It can be clasified
> >as regression as gcc fails to build spec with -march=pentium4, even when
> >the -march=pentium4 was missing in 3.0
>
> Would you explain this in more detail? I don't understand this paragraph.
3.0 didn't have -march=pentium4. This bug reproduces only with SSE enabled
so you need to enable pentium4 or athlon-xp. So in strict sense it is not
regression, but still people who will configure this as default won't be
able to compile code they did before.
Honza
>
> Yes, the patch is OK for the branch.
>
> --
> Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com