This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 3.1 configure.in patch

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: "joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com" <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:12:54 -0700
Subject: Re: 3.1 configure.in patch
References: <3CC95A0C.EF535BBB@OARcorp.com><157580000.1019843153@gandalf.codesourcery.com><200204270339.g3R3dKd09389@greed.delorie.com>

--On Friday, April 26, 2002 11:39:20 PM -0400 DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> 
wrote:

>
>> > Mark.. could you approve this?
>>
>> Approved.   Thanks.
>
> ... gentle reminder to all that ./Makefile.in, ./configure,
> ./configure.in, and ./config/ are in sync with the src repository
> (binutils, gdb, newlib, etc).  Patches approved for either should be
> applied to both to keep them in sync.

That sounds easier than it is, in that some of us (including myself)
do not have write access to the other repository.  But, we should
at least send the patches to someone who does.  What's the right
email address for that?

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.1 configure.in patch
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: 3.1 configure.in patch
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- 3.1 configure.in patch
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: 3.1 configure.in patch
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: 3.1 configure.in patch
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]