This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc/gcc/testsuite ChangeLog gcc.dg/c99-bool-1.c
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <rth at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:31:05 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: gcc/gcc/testsuite ChangeLog gcc.dg/c99-bool-1.c
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 08:12:22PM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Making the warning expected is hardly a correct fix to a warning
> > regression. These warnings simply shouldn't be generated for comparisons
> > that aren't in the original code.
>
> I know, but I don't know how to deal with this off-hand, and
> wanted the regression tester off my back.
The regression tester is meant to be on the back of people causing
regressions! dg-bogus { xfail *-*-* } would be better than dg-warning,
since the warning is wrong, but as it's a regression the xfail shouldn't
be there either.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk