This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such (take 3)
- From: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 06:42:51 -0700 (MST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such (take 3)
> >For example, during the compilation of g++.dg/inherit/template-as-base.C
> >using cc1plus duplicate_decls is never called! Which would also explain
> >why deleting that line altogether has no effect on the regression.
>
> This particular fail is not very relevant, I believe. Currently it
> happens for 3.2 on many platforms also /without/ your latest one-line
> patch.
Ahh. Thanks. I was working on a patch candidate, but decided to kill
the bootstrap after stage3 when the resulting compiler didn't solve this
issue. Several attempts later and I couldn't make the problem go away.
I'll try that first change again to see if it fixes the other regressions.
Sorry for the confusion.
Roger
--