This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Ada] fix lib and tools build
- From: Laurent Guerby <guerby at acm dot org>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dewar at gnat dot com, kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, gcc at gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:03:28 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Ada] fix lib and tools build
- References: <3CA639D4.9060905@acm.org> <u8d6xlt8x0.fsf@gromit.moeb>
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> This patch looks fine to me. I just have build all of ada with it for
> the first time since the broken merge happened. Thanks.
Thanks for testing, I'll wait for an Ada maintainer approval for HEAD.
> It's -r gcc-3_1-branch if you want the 3.1 branch.
Silly me :).
> But since Ada on 3.1 and mainline are quite different at the moment,
> it might not make sense to apply your patch there.
I tested and the current 3.1 branch has 23 more ACATS failures
than HEAD (ie same status as head of end of february 2002).
I tried to replace the 3.1 gcc/ada directory by the HEAD
one but got link failures probably due to backend symbol
name changes, I didn't investigate further
Richard, I didn't follow closely the changes to the backend, are
there any impossibility in getting the HEAD ada sources compilable
in the 3.1 branch, I noticed nearly/all of your backend
fixes have been commited to both head and branch.
Robert, what is the plan for 3.1? Does ACT work with 3.1 or HEAD?
--
Laurent Guerby <guerby@acm.org>