This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Re: 3 new fails with builtin patch
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 08:29:32 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 3 new fails with builtin patch
> Hi. However, why g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins9.C does not fail during
> g++ regression testing? This I cannot understand because, to be honest,
> I don't know in detail how those tests are carried out. Perhaps are
> build not link?!? Roger (and Mark) of course meant to link too, but...
Dunno.
> Notice, however, that running it -O0 helped us catching this problem ;-)
> But I agree that -O2 is much more realistic. Ideally, we should iterate
> over various optmization levels, perhaps...
Running both -O0 and -O2 seems the best solution. How can that be done in
dejagnu? I think the java testsuite does this.
-benjamin