This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such (take 2)
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 12:40:07 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such (take 2)
I'm for it. Please check it in. Sorry for the delay. This makes <cstring>
and <cmath> consistent, which to me is an unremarked-upon side benefit. Yay!
Roger, as you've noticed, dealing with C++/C header issues is no picnic
as it involves aspects of libstdc++/glibc/g++. Thanks for sticking with it.
As an aside, is there a way to test the performance win?
-benjamin