This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: lang_expand_expr langhook

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:03:30 -0800
Subject: Re: lang_expand_expr langhook
References: <20020326200002.GA22458@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20020326160641.A16441@redhat.com> <20020327070654.GA4901@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:06:55AM +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> Does this look better?

Yes, this is ok.

> I've assumed that all compilers can convert enum->int and int->enum
> without error.

I can't imagine that not being the case, since that's exactly
what happens with K&R style arguments.


r~

References:
- lang_expand_expr langhook
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: lang_expand_expr langhook
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: lang_expand_expr langhook
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]