This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: lang_expand_expr langhook

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:13:24 +0000
Subject: Re: lang_expand_expr langhook
References: <20020326200002.GA22458@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20020326160641.A16441@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:-

> Previously, in the default case, we'd abort.  Now it looks like
> we'll recurse and hit the default again.  Not good.

OK, I'll have it abort.  Thanks for spotting that.
 
> As for the expand_modifier thing...  Hum.  I don't _really_ like
> any of the solutions.  Why don't we ignore the problem and make
> the fourth lang_hooks.expand_expr argument be an int?

Yes, I wondered about that.

Neil.

References:
- lang_expand_expr langhook
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: lang_expand_expr langhook
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]