This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such (take 2)
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 01:10:11 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such (take 2)
--On Saturday, March 23, 2002 05:55:42 PM -0700 Roger Sayle
<roger@eyesopen.com> wrote:
>
>> >> The new builtin_function needs to say what all of its parameters are
>> >> in its comments. Roger, would you commit both patches, with that
>> >> change, or -- if you do not have checkin privileges -- send me an
>> >> email with the combined patch, including that change, and then I'll
>> >> be happy to apply it for you?
>> >
>> > My apologies.
>>
>> Please let me know how your efforts to get the whole thing working
>> proceed.
>
>
> Here's the full version of the patch to enable built-ins in g++ in
> both the global and std namespaces.
This version looks good to me. As I read it, the V3 change is only
necessary to make the builtin optimization work -- without it, V3
would still work, but we would get the unoptimized version of the
builtins, correct?
If that is so, the patch is fine for mainline and branch. Please check
it in. Thanks!
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com