This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] cpplib: -Wno-endif-labels

On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 10:03:50PM +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> Phil Edwards wrote:-
> 
> > Really?  I didn't realize -pedantic trumped /later/ options.  (I'm not
> > arguing, just expressing surprise.)
> 
> Hmm.  Maybe you're right.  I just was thinking of safety, in that if
> the user has requested -pedantic then we're non-conforming if we don't
> output a diagnostic.  I wonder what others like Zack or Joseph think.

By analogy with -Wno-long-long, it shouldn't.  I can easily see a
situation where someone needed all the mandatory diagnostics except
this one (which was triggered by some third party library header, say,
that couldn't be changed).

zw
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]