This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
fix cygwin xfail on gcc.dg/weak-1.c
- From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
- To: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:16:33 +1100
- Subject: fix cygwin xfail on gcc.dg/weak-1.c
Test gcc.dg/fails on cygwin with
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ ]*[ ]_?a
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ ]*[ ]_?b
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ ]*[ ]_?c
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ ]*[ ]_?d
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ ]*[ ]_?e
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ ]*[ ]_?g
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ ]*[ ]_?j
Fixed thus, unless there is a better suggestion. OK for 3.1 and 3.2?
2002-03-22 David.Billinghurst <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com>
gcc.dg/weak1.c: Early return from dg-final on platforms that
do not support weak symbols
diff -u -r1.2.2.2 weak-1.c
--- weak-1.c 2002/03/17 12:48:34 1.2.2.2
+++ weak-1.c 2002/03/22 06:09:59
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
/* COFF does not support weak, and dg doesn't support UNSUPPORTED. */
/* { dg-do compile { xfail *-*-coff i?86-pc-cygwin } } */
+/* { dg-final { global target_triplet } } */
+/* { dg-final { if [string match i?86-pc-cygwin $target_triplet ] {return} } } */
+/* { dg-final { if [string match *-*-coff $target_triplet ] {return} } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "weak\[^ \t\]*\[ \t]_?a" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "weak\[^ \t\]*\[ \t]_?b" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "weak\[^ \t\]*\[ \t]_?c" } } */
@@ -10,6 +13,7 @@
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "weak\[^ \t\]*\[ \t]_?g" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "weak\[^ \t\]*\[ \t]_?i" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "weak\[^ \t\]*\[ \t]_?j" } } */
+
#pragma weak a
int a;