This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: integrated -save-temps and the death of specs
- From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Mar 2002 16:35:16 +1100
- Subject: Re: integrated -save-temps and the death of specs
- References: <10203200226.AA17263@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> writes:
> i don't see any reason to use spec files in config/*.h files.
> I think that's a very different issue. I can certainly accept an argument
> that they should be someplace else at compile-time, but I still feel
> they are very useful to have arond when the driver is *run*.
Agreed. I don't really care for the driver, since it is kinda neat to
be able to change the driver's behavior without recompiling... But the
.h spec nonsense we have scattered throughout I have a big problem
with.
That aside, my patch integrating cpp0 into "cc1 -E" I think is still
valid irregardless of what we do (or do not do) with specs in the
future.
Cheers
aldy