This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch for 64-bit HP-UX libstdc++-v3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Mar 2002 15:59:37 -0300
- Subject: Re: Patch for 64-bit HP-UX libstdc++-v3
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1020315102621.27416B-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>
On Mar 15, 2002, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I just had a thought about this patch making libstdc++-v3 dependent on
>> libiberty. Isn't linking a shared library against an archive one
>> considered a bad thing? libstdc++-v3 can be built shared or archive but
>> it looks like libiberty is always archive only. Does this introduce
>> problems when libstdc++-v3 is linked against libiberty?
> Hmmmm. I don't know.
It is a problem, indeed. If libiberty is not at least PIC, we'll be
in trouble for libstdc++.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer