This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch for 64-bit HP-UX libstdc++-v3
- From: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
- To: bkoz at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 10:41:26 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: Patch for 64-bit HP-UX libstdc++-v3
> > I just had a thought about this patch making libstdc++-v3 dependent on
> > libiberty. Isn't linking a shared library against an archive one
> > considered a bad thing? libstdc++-v3 can be built shared or archive but
> > it looks like libiberty is always archive only. Does this introduce
> > problems when libstdc++-v3 is linked against libiberty?
>
> Hmmmm. I don't know.
>
> Did you ever figure out the C99 issue?
No, but I don't think it is necessarily a problem. strtoll gets added
to libstdc++ and used by __convert_to_v the way it needs to be, whether
or not it should even be available as a standalone function, I just
don't know.
Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com