This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

fix -fzero-initialized-in-bss bug


Shows up building glibc.  The problem is that we emitted a
common symbol instead of a bss symbol.  We did that because
the variable was incorrectly marked common.


r~



        * c-decl.c (start_decl): Initialized variables are not common.

RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/c-decl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.303
diff -u -p -r1.303 c-decl.c
--- c-decl.c	2002/02/28 13:29:47	1.303
+++ c-decl.c	2002/03/03 08:54:38
@@ -3476,7 +3476,7 @@ start_decl (declarator, declspecs, initi
      initializer equal to zero.  (Section 3.7.2)
      -fno-common gives strict ANSI behavior.  Usually you don't want it.
      This matters only for variables with external linkage.  */
-  if (! flag_no_common || ! TREE_PUBLIC (decl))
+  if (!initialized && (! flag_no_common || ! TREE_PUBLIC (decl)))
     DECL_COMMON (decl) = 1;
 
   /* Set attributes here so if duplicate decl, will have proper attributes.  */
Index: testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20020303-1.c
===================================================================
RCS file: 20020303-1.c
diff -N 20020303-1.c
--- /dev/null	Tue May  5 13:32:27 1998
+++ 20020303-1.c	Sun Mar  3 00:56:43 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+/* With -fzero-initialized-in-bss, we made I a common symbol instead
+   of a symbol in the .bss section.  Not only does that break semantics,
+   but a common symbol can't be weak.  */
+
+int i __attribute__((weak)) = 0;


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]