This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Target config headers out of config.h


On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 10:33:16AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 09:35:56AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > What's your reaction to tearing out all support for !REAL_ARITHMETIC,
> 
> Glee,

Shouldn't be hard - I'll get to it tonight.

> > and forcing REAL_VALUE_TYPE to be big enough for a 128-bit constant
> > even if the target doesn't happen to support them?
> 
> Eh, I guess that'd be ok.  It'd probably have to happen with
> my vague plans to rewrite real.c to contain no ifdefs anyway.

Do you have a better idea?  I don't see any other way for tree.h to
declare struct tree_real_cst without needing to see target
configuration info.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]