This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Add documentation (1/5)
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Sebastian Pop <m1sp at csc dot liv dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 18:42:49 -0500
- Subject: Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Add documentation (1/5)
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <20020228200303.A17926@linux18.lxfarm.csc.liv.ac.uk>
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following patch adds documentation on the simplify pass,
> and on the c-call-graph.
>
> Seb.
>
> PS: Documentation comes first :-)
>
>
> 2002-02-28 Sebastian Pop <s.pop@laposte.net>
>
> * Makefile.in : Add dependences for soft-eng.texi, trees.texi,
> and simple.texi.
> * c-tree.texi : Remane the node Trees in C-Trees.
> Make the C-Trees node a section of Trees node from trees.texi,
> and reorder sections hierarchy.
> * gccint.texi : Change the description for the node Trees.
> Include the file trees.texi instead of c-tree.texi
> * trees.texi : New file.
>
Hmm, no. There is only one tree IR. We don't need to have
sections for Java and Fortran. Adding a sub-section for the
simple form should be enough.
> * gcc.texi : Add Soft-Eng in the main menu, and include the file
> soft-eng.texi.
> * soft-eng.texi : New file.
>
OK, but Soft-Eng doesn't sound right in this context. Maybe we
could call this section 'Program Understanding' or something
along those lines?
> * invoke.texi : Add the option -fdump-call-graph.
>
OK.
> * passes.texi : Add an item 'Tree simplification'.
> Complete the sentence with the word 'option'.
> Move the definition of 'LCM' at its first occurence.
>
OK. I'd suggest submitting the last two changes to mainline.
It's a documentation bug.
> * simple.texi : New file.
>
OK.
Diego.