This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: powerpc patch 5 of 9

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:52:57 +1030
Subject: Re: powerpc patch 5 of 9
References: <20020220110100.GL1054@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <67D99841-2632-11D6-84AE-003065C86F94@apple.com>

On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:48:18AM -0800, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> I think using R11 instead of R12 is likely to break Darwin.  Please
> conditionalize this out, or verify that it doesn't really break.

static_chain?  Hmm, that will be broken on svr4 too.  In fact it
already was broken by the save_LR_around_toc_setup code.

Does this mean ppc svr4 should ignore the ABI if we use _savef*/_restf* ?
Or just continue to not use _savef*/_restf* ?

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- powerpc patch 5 of 9
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: powerpc patch 5 of 9
  - From: Dale Johannesen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]