This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: I run autoconf and get an empty file for "configure"

From: Adam Megacz <patches at lists dot megacz dot com>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 10 Feb 2002 16:14:05 -0800
Subject: Re: I run autoconf and get an empty file for "configure"
Organization: Myself
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10202101118090.6855-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>


Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
> Neither configure nor configure.in in the toplevel directory are generated
> scripts. Both are maintained by hand.

Urgh.

If I make changes to Makefile.in, do I need to change
configure/configure.in, or will the changes get absorbed
automatically?

  - a

-- 
"In the dream, someone was asking me 'So what you're saying is that
 all your dreams are lucid?' 'Yes,' I replied 'except for this one.'"
                                                         -- epepke@k5

Follow-Ups:
- Re: I run autoconf and get an empty file for "configure"
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Re: I run autoconf and get an empty file for "configure"
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]