This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] fix to cfganal.c for target/5469
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com>, janis187 at us dot ibm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:10:32 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix to cfganal.c for target/5469
- References: <OF60979FE5.7AE9C9B5-ONC1256B57.0054C248@de.ibm.com> <20020205093404.D19915@redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:34:04AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 04:51:17PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Why should all assignments to fixed registers (including, in this case,
> > the condition code register) be kept with a function call?
>
> They shouldn't. Only straight moves should be. But I see
> that we didn't check general_operand for the other side of
> the move.
Richard, I'll try to fix this if you want, but since you know what it
should do it would be easier if you do it. Let me know.
Janis