This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: Re: ICE in 920624-1.c with -O3 -funroll-loops on vax-dec-ultrix4.3
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Cc: John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:47:31 -0800
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: ICE in 920624-1.c with -O3 -funroll-loops on vax-dec-ultrix4.3
- References: <20020204161620.B19052@redhat.com> <12748.1012869352@porcupine.cygnus.com>
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 05:35:52PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
> Agreed. As I mentioned, I'm extremely tempted to burn tonight and
> get rid of having a separate insn for the ADDR_VEC/ADDR_DIFF_VEC.
>
> Thoughts?
If you can make it work, I'm all for it.
BTW, another edge case you should consider in doing this is
s390, which dumps the tablejump label into the constant pool.
I don't think there's an integrated sim for that one, but
perhaps faking it via "ln -s /bin/true s390-linux-run" and
checking that the execute tests compile is a good enough
sanity check.
r~