This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Demangler woes with current CVS and type names

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:48:35 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Demangler woes with current CVS and type names
References: <20020129230710.A3497@disaster.basement.lan><19540000.1012426903@warlock.codesourcery.com><20020130184929.A7304@disaster.basement.lan>

> Based on the timestamp of your other email, I want to verify that the
> original patch as posted is in fact okay.  (Messages are arriving in an
> odd order today.)

Yes, the original patch is OK.  At some point, the demangler interface
got made smarter, precisely so that people could demangle at runtime
the names they get from typeid.  Of course, they can't with the GNU
C++ library as shipped, due to the licensing issues, but in other
compilers they can.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Demangler woes with current CVS and type names
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- [PATCH] Demangler woes with current CVS and type names
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: [PATCH] Demangler woes with current CVS and type names
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] Demangler woes with current CVS and type names
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]