This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: c: Bitfield fixes for PRs 3325, 3326

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 10:06:48 -0800
Subject: Re: c: Bitfield fixes for PRs 3325, 3326
References: <20020126172956.GA9801@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201261757580.32042-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 05:58:56PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > ...We have to document which ones are acceptable, but enums are
> > fine.
> 
> C90 does not permit implementation-defined types here, so even if we
> define some such types for C99 we must pedwarn for them outside C99 mode.

Ah.  I don't have a copy of C90.  Thanks for the clarification.

zw

References:
- Re: c: Bitfield fixes for PRs 3325, 3326
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: c: Bitfield fixes for PRs 3325, 3326
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]