This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH, rs6000 long const take 3
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Tom Rix <trix at redhat dot com>
- Cc: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:00:06 -0800
- Subject: Re: PATCH, rs6000 long const take 3
- References: <200201042219.RAA30058@makai.watson.ibm.com> <3C3E1B3E.3B9D65AC@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:52:46PM -0600, Tom Rix wrote:
> Other than that they are evenly matched.
> I don't think there is enough of a win to check for the PLUS algorithm.
Depending on where this is used. If it is ever used in early rtl
generation, PLUS favours being merged with address loads.
r~