This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] alias.c find_base_value fix
- From: "John David Anglin" <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:13:28 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] alias.c find_base_value fix
Forwarded message:
>From dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca Tue Jan 8 14:04:30 EST 2002
Message-Id: <200201081904.g08J4SNd005673@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alias.c find_base_value fix
To: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (John David Anglin)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:04:27 -0500 (EST)
From: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl, rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "John David Anglin" at Jan 6, 2002 05:14:20 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> in an insn find_dummy_reload, but didn't investigate further. On the downside,
> g77.f-torture/execute/20001201.f and g77.f-torture/execute/io1.f now fail.
I have tracked these regressions to this patch:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-01/msg00306.html>.
At first, I thought the problem was that "b" needed to be enclosed
in parentheses. However, this didn't fix the problem while reverting
the patch does fix the regressions.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)
--
J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)