This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fix kennerism

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, jh at suse dot cz, geoffk at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:24:26 +0100
Subject: Re: fix kennerism
References: <10112302210.AA06653@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20011230173258.L4087@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

> On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 05:10:10PM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> >     we're now back to the cfgbuild.o miscomparison.
> > 
> > cfgcleanup.c has a warning about an uninitialized variable. I'd start there.
> 
> That certainly should be fixed (Jan, could you look into it, it is not
> obvious to me that it will be always properly initialized when it is going
> to be used), but the warning is nothing new and I don't think my patch to
The code is correct - when threading is notdone, the value is not used.
I may make patch to fix the warning shortly.

Honza
> that function could trigger unitialized use of it if it was guaranteed to be
> initialized before.
> 
> 	Jakub

References:
- Re: fix kennerism
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: fix kennerism
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]