This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on


    That doesn't mean your patch doesn't cause the current bootstrap
    failure.  In fact, I checked, by backing out the patches responsible
    for the previous failure, and your patch definitely causes bootstrap
    to fail. 

DJE came to the opposite conclusion, so something odd is going on here.

    A big clue that your patch was broken should have been the 38
    powerpc-eabisim regressions.  

RTH just fixed those.  Did that fix the bootstrap problem you see?

    Another clue is that the location of the bootstrap failure changed;
    before it was a compare failure, now it's a crash while building
    stage1 libgcc.

Hmm.  It might be a good idea for the regression tester to say that.
When it said "it also failed before you patch", I ignored the failure.
Had it said it was a different failure, I would have treated it differently.

    In fact, this is why I need you to fix your patch ASAP; it's
    preventing me from further work.  What I'd like to do is have the
    tester consider .o file miscomparisons as another kind of testcase
    failure.

I think the tester should consider failures at different points
as different: compilation failures, failures during the build of stage2,
failures during running of stage2, comparison failures, and failures
building other libraries.  This will avoid the sort of problem we had here.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]