This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: scheduling vs lexical scopes

>>>>> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:15:29PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:

>> Yes, it fixes Jakub's debug-3.c test.  His debug-4.c test is
>> still failing.  Any ideas about that one?

> But would it fix debug-3.c at -O2 -g (where it was failing too)?
> There are no DECL_INLINE decls, so it shouldn't make any difference.

No, I would expect that to still break; this is a related, but separate
issue.  My patch fixes the problem of inlined functions trying to refer to
the abstract function; this has to do with placement of the debug info for
nested functions.  This should probably be fixed by attaching orphaned
nested functions to their containing function directly as a last resort.
I'll give it a try.

Jason
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]