This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH, rs6000 (alpha?) long const

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Rix <trix at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 19:30:35 -0800
Subject: Re: PATCH, rs6000 (alpha?) long const
References: <3C2DDFAE.83C9257F@redhat.com> <20011229113944.B15556@redhat.com> <3C2E36AF.9617D83C@redhat.com> <20011229161316.A27391@redhat.com> <3C2E84BF.42C63D38@redhat.com>

On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 09:06:39PM -0600, Tom Rix wrote:
> > What is the number that didn't match?
> 
> -131072

That's 0xffff_ffff_fffe_0000, which is definitely valid.  So
why doesn't that insn get recognized?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH, rs6000 (alpha?) long const --verbose
  - From: Tom Rix

References:
- PATCH, rs6000 (alpha?) long const
  - From: Tom Rix
- Re: PATCH, rs6000 (alpha?) long const
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: PATCH, rs6000 (alpha?) long const
  - From: Tom Rix
- Re: PATCH, rs6000 (alpha?) long const
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: PATCH, rs6000 (alpha?) long const
  - From: Tom Rix

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]